16 Jun 2025

Electromagnetic Waves in Conductors: Relaxation and Skin Depth

Charge relaxation, complex propagation constant, attenuation, conductor impedance, and skin depth.

bsc semester-v electromagnetic-theory mj-8 unit-ii conducting-media skin-depth

In a homogeneous ohmic conductor,

\[\mathbf J=\sigma\mathbf E, \qquad \mathbf D=\epsilon\mathbf E, \qquad \mathbf B=\mu\mathbf H.\]

The conduction current and displacement current are both present. Their magnitude ratio for a harmonic field is

\[\boxed{\frac{J}{\lvert\partial D/\partial t\rvert}=\frac{\sigma}{\omega\epsilon}}.\]

A good conductor at a given frequency satisfies $\sigma\gg\omega\epsilon$; a good dielectric satisfies $\sigma\ll\omega\epsilon$.

Charge-relaxation time

Take the divergence of Ohm’s law and use Gauss’s law:

\[\nabla\cdot\mathbf J =\sigma\nabla\cdot\mathbf E =\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}\rho.\]

Charge continuity, $\nabla\cdot\mathbf J+\partial\rho/\partial t=0$, then becomes

\[\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}\rho=0.\]

Separating variables gives

\[\boxed{\rho(t)=\rho(0)e^{-t/\tau}}, \qquad \boxed{\tau=\frac{\epsilon}{\sigma}}.\]

$\tau$ is the charge-relaxation time in seconds. It is the time in which an initially deposited volume charge falls to $1/e$ of its initial value.

Wave equation with ohmic loss

In a source-free region inside the conductor,

\[\nabla\times\mathbf E=-\mu\frac{\partial\mathbf H}{\partial t}, \qquad \nabla\times\mathbf H=\sigma\mathbf E+\epsilon\frac{\partial\mathbf E}{\partial t}.\]

Taking the curl of Faraday’s law, using $\nabla\cdot\mathbf E=0$ away from the relaxed charge, gives

\[\boxed{\nabla^2\mathbf E -\mu\sigma\frac{\partial\mathbf E}{\partial t} -\mu\epsilon\frac{\partial^2\mathbf E}{\partial t^2}=0}.\]

The term proportional to the first time derivative produces attenuation.

Use the convention

\[\mathbf E(z,t)=\Re\!\left\{\mathbf E_0e^{i(\widetilde k z-\omega t)}\right\}, \qquad \widetilde k=\beta+i\alpha,\]

where $\alpha>0$. Since $e^{i\widetilde kz}=e^{i\beta z}e^{-\alpha z}$, $\beta$ is the phase constant in $\mathrm{rad\,m^{-1}}$ and $\alpha$ is the attenuation constant in $\mathrm{Np\,m^{-1}}$. Substitution gives

\[\boxed{\widetilde{k}^{\,2}=\omega^2\mu\epsilon+i\omega\mu\sigma}.\]

Equating real and imaginary parts of $(\beta+i\alpha)^2$,

\[\beta^2-\alpha^2=\omega^2\mu\epsilon, \qquad 2\alpha\beta=\omega\mu\sigma.\]

Solving these two equations with $\alpha,\beta>0$ gives

\[\boxed{\alpha=\omega\sqrt{\frac{\mu\epsilon}{2} \left[\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\sigma}{\omega\epsilon}\right)^2}-1\right]}},\] \[\boxed{\beta=\omega\sqrt{\frac{\mu\epsilon}{2} \left[\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\sigma}{\omega\epsilon}\right)^2}+1\right]}}.\]

The phase velocity is $v_p=\omega/\beta$ and the wavelength in the conductor is $2\pi/\beta$.

Skin depth

The field amplitude falls as $e^{-\alpha z}$. The skin depth is therefore defined by

\[\boxed{\delta=\frac1\alpha},\]

so $\lvert E(\delta)\rvert=E_0/e$. Intensity is proportional to $\lvert E\rvert^2$, hence it falls to $e^{-2}$ at one skin depth.

For a good conductor, $\sigma/(\omega\epsilon)\gg1$, and the exact expressions reduce to

\[\boxed{\alpha\simeq\beta\simeq\sqrt{\frac{\omega\mu\sigma}{2}}}, \qquad \boxed{\delta\simeq\sqrt{\frac{2}{\omega\mu\sigma}}}.\]

Thus increasing frequency, permeability, or conductivity confines the field more strongly to the surface.

Equation-generated exponential decay of electromagnetic field amplitude with depth in a conductor
The skin depth is the $1/e$ amplitude distance. Editable TikZ source.

Complex wave impedance

Faraday’s law for the same convention gives $\widetilde k\times\mathbf E_0=\omega\mu\mathbf H_0$. Therefore

\[\boxed{\widetilde\eta=\frac{E_0}{H_0} =\frac{\omega\mu}{\widetilde k} =\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon+i\sigma/\omega}}}.\]

Because $\widetilde\eta$ is complex, $\mathbf E$ and $\mathbf H$ are not exactly in phase. In the good-conductor limit,

\[\widetilde\eta\simeq(1-i)\sqrt{\frac{\omega\mu}{2\sigma}}\]

for the $e^{-i\omega t}$ convention used here. Reversing the time convention complex-conjugates this expression but leaves all measurable attenuation and power unchanged.

The exact real/imaginary propagation relations and the good-conductor skin-depth limit are checked in the Unit II Maxima worksheet; every printed residual is zero.

© Rajesh Kumar, SKMU · Physics Lecture Notes · rajeshphy.github.io

Discussion

Share This Page