29 Jul 2025

Dielectric and Optical Properties

Polarization, local fields, Langevin-Debye theory, normal and anomalous dispersion, Cauchy and Sellmeier relations, complex permittivity, and optical attenuation.

bsc semester-vi solid-state-physics dielectrics optical-properties dispersion

Polarization is electric dipole moment per unit volume. In a linear isotropic dielectric,

\[\mathbf D=\epsilon_0\mathbf E+\mathbf P =\epsilon_0\epsilon_r\mathbf E,\]

so

\[\boxed{\mathbf P=\epsilon_0(\epsilon_r-1)\mathbf E =\epsilon_0\chi_e\mathbf E}.\]

$\mathbf P$ has unit $\mathrm{C\,m^{-2}}$; $\epsilon_r$ and $\chi_e$ are dimensionless.

Polarizability and local field

If one molecule develops dipole $\mathbf p=\alpha\mathbf E_{\rm loc}$, then $\alpha$ has unit $\mathrm{C\,m^2V^{-1}}$. For number density $N$,

\[\mathbf P=N\alpha\mathbf E_{\rm loc}.\]

In an isotropic cubic dielectric, a spherical Lorentz cavity gives

\[\boxed{\mathbf E_{\rm loc}=\mathbf E+\frac{\mathbf P}{3\epsilon_0}}.\]

Substitution yields

\[P=N\alpha\left(E+\frac{P}{3\epsilon_0}\right).\]

Using $P=\epsilon_0(\epsilon_r-1)E$ and solving,

\[\boxed{\frac{\epsilon_r-1}{\epsilon_r+2} =\frac{N\alpha}{3\epsilon_0}},\]

the Clausius-Mossotti relation.

Langevin-Debye equation

A permanent dipole $p_0$ at angle $\theta$ to the local field has energy

\[U=-p_0E_{\rm loc}\cos\theta.\]

With $x=p_0E_{\rm loc}/(k_BT)$, its orientational partition integral is

\[Z=2\pi\int_0^\pi e^{x\cos\theta}\sin\theta\,d\theta =4\pi\frac{\sinh x}{x}.\]

Therefore

\[\langle\cos\theta\rangle =\frac{d\ln Z}{dx}=\coth x-\frac1x\equiv L(x).\]

For $x\ll1$, $L(x)=x/3+O(x^3)$, and

\[P_{\rm or}=Np_0L(x) \simeq\frac{Np_0^2}{3k_BT}E_{\rm loc}.\]

If $\alpha_i$ is the induced electronic-plus-ionic polarizability, the effective weak-field polarizability is

\[\alpha=\alpha_i+\frac{p_0^2}{3k_BT}.\]

The local-field result becomes the Langevin-Debye equation

\[\boxed{ \frac{\epsilon_r-1}{\epsilon_r+2} =\frac{N}{3\epsilon_0}\left(\alpha_i+\frac{p_0^2}{3k_BT}\right) }.\]

Complex dielectric constant

Use the time convention $E(t)=\operatorname{Re}[E_0e^{-i\omega t}]$. A bound charge $q$ of mass $m$ obeys

\[m\ddot x+m\gamma\dot x+m\omega_0^2x=qE.\]

For $x=x_0e^{-i\omega t}$,

\[x_0=\frac{qE_0/m}{\omega_0^2-\omega^2-i\gamma\omega}.\]

With $N$ oscillators per unit volume and $P=Nqx$,

\[\boxed{ \epsilon_r(\omega)=\epsilon_\infty+ \frac{\Omega^2}{\omega_0^2-\omega^2-i\gamma\omega}}, \qquad \Omega^2=\frac{Nq^2}{\epsilon_0m}.\]

Write $\epsilon_r=\epsilon^{\prime}+i\epsilon^{\prime\prime}$. Multiplying by the complex conjugate of the denominator gives

\[\boxed{ \epsilon'=\epsilon_\infty+ \frac{\Omega^2(\omega_0^2-\omega^2)} {(\omega_0^2-\omega^2)^2+\gamma^2\omega^2}},\] \[\boxed{ \epsilon''=\frac{\Omega^2\gamma\omega} {(\omega_0^2-\omega^2)^2+\gamma^2\omega^2}}.\]

$\epsilon^{\prime\prime}>0$ represents loss. The mean absorbed power density is

\[\boxed{\langle p\rangle=\frac12\omega\epsilon_0\epsilon''\lvert E_0\rvert^2}\]

in $\mathrm{W\,m^{-3}}$.

Real and imaginary Lorentz dielectric response showing normal and anomalous dispersion near resonance
The curves use the displayed Lorentz equations. Absorption peaks where $\epsilon^{\prime\prime}$ is large; the rapid reversal of the real response produces an anomalous-dispersion interval adjacent to otherwise normal dispersion.

Normal and anomalous dispersion

Away from resonance, damping is negligible and a transparent nonmagnetic material has $n^2\simeq\epsilon_r$. With several resonances,

\[n^2(\omega)=1+\sum_j\frac{A_j}{\omega_j^2-\omega^2}.\]

Below a resonance, increasing $\omega$ normally increases $n$: $dn/d\omega>0$, equivalently $dn/d\lambda<0$. Close to an absorption resonance the slope can reverse, giving anomalous dispersion $dn/d\omega<0$.

Using $\omega=2\pi c/\lambda$ and defining $C_j=(2\pi c/\omega_j)^2$ gives the Sellmeier form

\[\boxed{n^2(\lambda)=1+\sum_j\frac{B_j\lambda^2}{\lambda^2-C_j}}.\]

Far from resonance, $C_j/\lambda^2\ll1$ and

\[\frac{\lambda^2}{\lambda^2-C_j} =\frac1{1-C_j/\lambda^2} \simeq1+\frac{C_j}{\lambda^2}+\frac{C_j^2}{\lambda^4}+\cdots.\]

Taking the square root and collecting constants produces Cauchy’s transparent-region relation

\[\boxed{n(\lambda)=A+\frac{B}{\lambda^2}+\frac{C}{\lambda^4}+\cdots}.\]

Complex refractive index and extinction

Let the complex refractive index be

\[\widetilde n=n+i\kappa,\]

where $\kappa$ is the extinction coefficient. For a nonmagnetic solid,

\[(n+i\kappa)^2=\epsilon'+i\epsilon'',\]

so

\[\boxed{n^2-\kappa^2=\epsilon'}, \qquad \boxed{2n\kappa=\epsilon''}.\]

A wave propagating along $z$ contains

\[e^{i\widetilde n\omega z/c-i\omega t} =e^{-\kappa\omega z/c}e^{i(n\omega z/c-\omega t)}.\]

Its intensity therefore obeys $I(z)=I_0e^{-\alpha z}$ with

\[\boxed{\alpha=\frac{2\omega\kappa}{c}=\frac{4\pi\kappa}{\lambda}}.\]

At normal incidence from vacuum, the optical reflectance is

\[\boxed{R=\left\lvert\frac{\widetilde n-1}{\widetilde n+1}\right\rvert^2 =\frac{(n-1)^2+\kappa^2}{(n+1)^2+\kappa^2}}.\]

Thus $n$ controls phase velocity and refraction, while $\kappa$ controls attenuation; both follow from the same complex dielectric response.

Maxima verification worksheet

© Rajesh Kumar, SKMU · Physics Lecture Notes · rajeshphy.github.io

Discussion

Share This Page