06 Jul 2025

Plasma Physics and Hydromagnetic Waves

Kinetic moments, plasma oscillations, Debye shielding, magnetic confinement, magnetoplasma equations, and Alfvén and magnetosonic waves.

mj-16 plasma-physics debye-shielding plasma-confinement alfven-waves magnetosonic-waves

A plasma is an ionized many-particle medium in which collective electric and magnetic forces are important. On scales much larger than its shielding length it is approximately quasineutral,

\[\sum_s q_sn_s\simeq0,\]

although small charge separations produce plasma oscillations and shielding.

Moments of the Boltzmann equation

For species $s$, let $f_s(\mathbf r,\mathbf v,t)$ be the number-density distribution in phase space. Its kinetic equation is

\[\frac{\partial f_s}{\partial t} +\mathbf v\cdot\nabla f_s +\frac{q_s}{m_s}(\mathbf E+\mathbf v\times\mathbf B) \cdot\nabla_{\mathbf v}f_s=C_s[f].\]

Define the density, mean velocity, pressure tensor, and heat flux by

\[n_s=\int f_s\,d^3v, \qquad n_s\mathbf u_s=\int\mathbf v f_s\,d^3v,\] \[\mathsf P_s=m_s\int (\mathbf v-\mathbf u_s)(\mathbf v-\mathbf u_s)f_s\,d^3v,\] \[\mathbf q_s=\frac{m_s}{2}\int \lvert\mathbf v-\mathbf u_s\rvert^2(\mathbf v-\mathbf u_s)f_s\,d^3v.\]

Assume $f_s$ decreases fast enough as $\lvert\mathbf v\rvert\to\infty$ that all velocity-space surface terms vanish.

Integrating the kinetic equation over velocity gives

\[\frac{\partial n_s}{\partial t} +\nabla\cdot(n_s\mathbf u_s) =\int C_s\,d^3v.\]

Number-conserving collisions make the right side zero, so

\[\boxed{ \partial_t n_s+\nabla\cdot(n_s\mathbf u_s)=0. }\]

For the first moment, multiply by $m_sv_i$ and integrate. The second velocity moment separates as

\[m_s\int v_iv_jf_s\,d^3v =m_sn_su_{si}u_{sj}+P_{s,ij}.\]

Integration by parts in velocity gives

\[q_s\int v_i(\mathbf E+\mathbf v\times\mathbf B)_j \frac{\partial f_s}{\partial v_j}\,d^3v =-q_sn_s[\mathbf E+\mathbf u_s\times\mathbf B]_i.\]

Moving this term to the right and using the continuity equation yields

\[\boxed{ m_sn_s(\partial_t+\mathbf u_s\cdot\nabla)\mathbf u_s =q_sn_s(\mathbf E+\mathbf u_s\times\mathbf B) -\nabla\cdot\mathsf P_s+\mathbf R_s, }\]

where $\mathbf R_s=m_s\int\mathbf vC_s\,d^3v$ is collisional momentum transfer.

Multiplication by $m_sv^2/2$ gives the energy moment. For isotropic pressure $\mathsf P_s=p_s\mathsf I$ and internal-energy density $\varepsilon_s=3p_s/2$,

\[\boxed{ \partial_t\!\left(\frac12m_sn_su_s^2+\varepsilon_s\right) +\nabla\cdot\!\left[ \left(\frac12m_sn_su_s^2+\varepsilon_s+p_s\right)\mathbf u_s +\mathbf q_s\right] =q_sn_s\mathbf E\cdot\mathbf u_s+Q_s. }\]

The magnetic force does no work because $\mathbf u_s\cdot(\mathbf u_s\times\mathbf B)=0$.

Plasma oscillation

Consider cold electrons of equilibrium density $n_0$ displaced by $\xi$ relative to stationary ions. The two exposed charge sheets produce

\[E=\frac{en_0}{\epsilon_0}\xi\]

directed from the ion sheet to the electron sheet. The electron force is $-eE$, hence

\[m_e\ddot\xi=-\frac{n_0e^2}{\epsilon_0}\xi.\]

Therefore

\[\boxed{ \ddot\xi+\omega_{pe}^2\xi=0, \qquad \omega_{pe}=\sqrt{\frac{n_0e^2}{m_e\epsilon_0}}. }\]

$\omega_{pe}$ is in radians per second. Ion motion was neglected because $m_i\gg m_e$, and thermal pressure was neglected in this cold-plasma limit.

Debye shielding

Place a test charge $Q$ at the origin in an electron plasma with fixed ion background. Thermal equilibrium gives the electron density

\[n_e=n_0\exp\!\left(\frac{e\phi}{k_BT_e}\right) \simeq n_0\left(1+\frac{e\phi}{k_BT_e}\right),\]

where the linearization requires $\lvert e\phi\rvert\ll k_BT_e$. Thus, away from the test charge,

\[\rho=e(n_i-n_e)\simeq-\frac{n_0e^2}{k_BT_e}\phi.\]

Including the point source in Poisson’s equation gives

\[\nabla^2\phi-\frac{\phi}{\lambda_D^2} =-\frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}\delta^3(\mathbf r), \qquad \boxed{\lambda_D=\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_0k_BT_e}{n_0e^2}}}.\]

For $r>0$, spherical symmetry gives

\[\frac1{r^2}\frac d{dr}\left(r^2\frac{d\phi}{dr}\right) -\frac{\phi}{\lambda_D^2}=0.\]

Writing $u=r\phi$ reduces this to $u’‘-u/\lambda_D^2=0$. The boundary condition $\phi\to0$ at infinity removes the growing exponential. Integrating Poisson’s equation over a vanishing sphere fixes $-4\pi r^2\epsilon_0\phi’(r)\to Q$, so

\[\boxed{ \phi(r)=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0r}e^{-r/\lambda_D}. }\]

Shielding is collective when a Debye sphere contains many particles, $N_D=(4\pi/3)n_0\lambda_D^3\gg1$.

Magnetic confinement and magnetoplasma motion

For a uniform field $\mathbf B=B_0\hat{\mathbf z}$ and no electric field,

\[m_s\dot{\mathbf v}=q_s\mathbf v\times\mathbf B\]

gives

\[\dot v_x=\Omega_sv_y, \qquad \dot v_y=-\Omega_sv_x, \qquad \dot v_z=0, \qquad \Omega_s=\frac{q_sB_0}{m_s}.\]

Hence $v_x^2+v_y^2$ is constant and the orbit is circular with

\[\boxed{ \omega_{cs}=\frac{\lvert q_s\rvert B_0}{m_s}, \qquad r_{Ls}=\frac{v_\perp}{\omega_{cs}}. }\]

The sign of $q_s$ fixes the sense of rotation. A uniform magnetic field confines perpendicular motion but not motion parallel to the field. In a slowly varying field, $r_L\ll B/\lvert\nabla B\rvert$, the magnetic moment

\[\mu_m=\frac{m_sv_\perp^2}{2B}\]

is approximately conserved. With total kinetic energy also constant, a particle entering a stronger field is reflected when its parallel velocity reaches zero. If $B_0$ and pitch angle $\alpha_0$ are specified at entry and $B_m$ at the mirror,

\[\boxed{\sin^2\alpha_0\ge\frac{B_0}{B_m}}\]

is the mirror-confinement condition.

Fundamental magnetohydrodynamic equations

On scales long compared with kinetic lengths, a conducting plasma may be described by mass density $\rho_m$, bulk velocity $\mathbf u$, pressure $p$, and magnetic field $\mathbf B$. Ideal magnetohydrodynamics uses

\[\partial_t\rho_m+\nabla\cdot(\rho_m\mathbf u)=0,\] \[\rho_m(\partial_t+\mathbf u\cdot\nabla)\mathbf u =-\nabla p+\frac1{\mu_0}(\nabla\times\mathbf B)\times\mathbf B,\] \[\partial_t\mathbf B=\nabla\times(\mathbf u\times\mathbf B), \qquad \nabla\cdot\mathbf B=0,\] \[\mathbf E+\mathbf u\times\mathbf B=0, \qquad (\partial_t+\mathbf u\cdot\nabla) \left(\frac{p}{\rho_m^{\Gamma}}\right)=0.\]

These equations assume high conductivity, negligible displacement current, and a fluid scale much larger than particle gyro-radii.

Alfvén and magnetosonic waves

Linearize about a uniform static state $(\rho_0,p_0,\mathbf u_0=0,\mathbf B_0)$ and take every perturbation proportional to $e^{i(\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r-\omega t)}$. Put

\[v_A=\frac{B_0}{\sqrt{\mu_0\rho_0}}, \qquad c_s=\sqrt{\frac{\Gamma p_0}{\rho_0}}, \qquad \cos\theta=\frac{\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf B_0}{kB_0}.\]

The linearized continuity and pressure equations give

\[\rho_1=\frac{\rho_0}{\omega}\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf u_1, \qquad p_1=c_s^2\rho_1.\]

The induction equation gives

\[\mathbf B_1=-\frac1\omega \mathbf k\times(\mathbf u_1\times\mathbf B_0) =\frac1\omega [\mathbf B_0(\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf u_1) -\mathbf u_1(\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf B_0)].\]

Choose $\mathbf B_0=B_0\hat{\mathbf z}$ and put $\mathbf k$ in the $xz$- plane. The $y$ component decouples from compression. The linearized momentum equation becomes

\[(\omega^2-k^2v_A^2\cos^2\theta)u_y=0,\]

so the shear Alfvén wave has

\[\boxed{\omega^2=k^2v_A^2\cos^2\theta.}\]

The coupled $x,z$ components are

\[\begin{pmatrix} \omega^2-k^2v_A^2-k^2c_s^2\sin^2\theta &-k^2c_s^2\sin\theta\cos\theta\\ -k^2c_s^2\sin\theta\cos\theta &\omega^2-k^2c_s^2\cos^2\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}u_x\\u_z\end{pmatrix}=0.\]

A nonzero displacement requires the determinant to vanish:

\[\boxed{ \omega^4-k^2(v_A^2+c_s^2)\omega^2 +k^4v_A^2c_s^2\cos^2\theta=0. }\]

The fast and slow magnetosonic phase speeds are therefore

\[\boxed{ v_{f,s}^2=\frac12\left[ v_A^2+c_s^2 \pm\sqrt{(v_A^2+c_s^2)^2-4v_A^2c_s^2\cos^2\theta} \right]. }\]

For propagation parallel to $\mathbf B_0$, the two compressive speeds reduce to $v_A$ and $c_s$, while the shear Alfvén speed is $v_A$. For perpendicular propagation, the fast speed is $\sqrt{v_A^2+c_s^2}$; both the slow and shear Alfvén frequencies vanish in ideal MHD.

Equation-generated angular phase speeds of fast and slow magnetosonic waves and the shear Alfven wave
The plotted branches use \(c_s=0.6v_A\) and the exact dispersion relations above, from parallel to perpendicular propagation.

The plasma-frequency relation, shielding equation, gyro-speed conservation, mirror condition, and MHD dispersion determinant are checked in the Maxima worksheet; every printed residual is zero.

© Rajesh Kumar, SKMU · Physics Lecture Notes · rajeshphy.github.io

Discussion

Share This Page