05 Jun 2026

Angular Momentum and Rotations

Angular momentum as the generator of rotations, rotation operators, and transformation of quantum states.

msc semester-i quantum-mechanics rotations angular-momentum

In quantum mechanics, a spatial symmetry is represented by an operator acting on states. For rotations, the corresponding generator is angular momentum. This means that a finite rotation of a state is produced by an exponential operator built from the angular momentum operator.

The connection is the quantum version of a familiar classical idea: angular momentum is the quantity associated with rotational motion and rotational symmetry.

Rotation about an axis

For a rotation by angle $\theta$ about a unit vector $\hat{\mathbf n}$, the rotation operator is

\[\boxed{ U(R)=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\theta\,\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\mathbf J\right). }\]

For rotations about the coordinate axes,

\[U_z(\phi)=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\phi J_z\right),\] \[U_y(\theta)=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\theta J_y\right),\] \[U_x(\alpha)=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\alpha J_x\right).\]

The negative sign appears because the operator acts on the quantum state.

Infinitesimal rotation

For a very small angle $\delta\theta$ about the $z$-axis,

\[U_z(\delta\theta) \simeq 1-\frac{i}{\hbar}\delta\theta J_z.\]

Thus $J_z$ is the generator of rotations about the $z$-axis. Similarly, $J_x$ and $J_y$ generate rotations about the $x$ and $y$ axes.

Finite rotations are obtained by applying many infinitesimal rotations successively. This is why the exponential form appears.

Transformation of operators

If a state transforms as

\[\lvert \psi'\rangle=U\lvert\psi\rangle,\]

then an operator transforms as

\[A'=UAU^\dagger.\]

For a vector operator $\mathbf V$, the angular momentum generators satisfy

\[[J_i,V_j]=i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}V_k.\]

This relation means that $\mathbf V$ transforms as a vector under rotations.

Rotation of angular momentum eigenstates

Since

\[J_z\lvert j,m\rangle=\hbar m\lvert j,m\rangle,\]

a rotation about the $z$-axis gives

\[U_z(\phi)\lvert j,m\rangle = e^{-im\phi}\lvert j,m\rangle.\]

Thus an eigenstate of $J_z$ only gains a phase under rotation about the $z$-axis.

For rotations about other axes, states with different $m$ values are mixed.

Spin-one-half rotation

For spin one-half,

\[S_i=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_i.\]

A rotation about the $z$-axis is

\[U_z(\phi)=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{2}\phi\sigma_z\right).\]

Using $\sigma_z^2=I$,

\[U_z(\phi)= \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\phi/2}&0\\ 0&e^{i\phi/2} \end{pmatrix}.\]

For $\phi=2\pi$,

\[U_z(2\pi)=-I.\]

Therefore a spin-one-half state changes sign under a $2\pi$ rotation and returns exactly to itself only after a $4\pi$ rotation. This is one of the most striking features of spinors.

Rotational invariance and conservation

If the Hamiltonian is invariant under rotations, then

\[[H,\mathbf J]=0.\]

This implies conservation of angular momentum. For a spherically symmetric potential,

\[V=V(r),\]

the Hamiltonian commutes with $L^2$ and $L_z$:

\[[H,L^2]=0,\qquad [H,L_z]=0.\]

Hence angular momentum quantum numbers can be used to label the energy eigenstates.

Worked spinor rotation

For a general spin-one-half state in the $S_z$ basis,

\[\chi= \begin{pmatrix} a\\ b \end{pmatrix},\]

a rotation by $\phi$ about the $z$-axis gives

\[\chi'= U_z(\phi)\chi = \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\phi/2}&0\\ 0&e^{i\phi/2} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a\\ b \end{pmatrix}.\]

Therefore

\[\boxed{ \chi'= \begin{pmatrix} ae^{-i\phi/2}\\ be^{i\phi/2} \end{pmatrix}. }\]

For $\phi=2\pi$,

\[\chi'=-\chi.\]

This sign change has no effect on a single probability, but it is physically important in interference.

Infinitesimal operator change

For a small rotation about $z$,

\[U\simeq 1-\frac{i}{\hbar}\delta\phi J_z.\]

The transformed operator is

\[A'=UAU^\dagger.\]

Keeping only first-order terms,

\[\delta A=A'-A =-\frac{i}{\hbar}\delta\phi[J_z,A].\]

This formula is often the shortest way to connect commutators with rotations.

Main points

Practice questions

  1. Derive the infinitesimal rotation operator about the $z$-axis.
  2. Show that $U_z(\phi)\lvert j,m\rangle=e^{-im\phi}\lvert j,m\rangle$.
  3. Find the spin-one-half rotation matrix about the $z$-axis.
  4. Explain why spinors require a $4\pi$ rotation to return to the same state.
  5. Why does spherical symmetry imply conservation of angular momentum?
© Rajesh Kumar, SKMU Β· Physics Lecture Notes Β· rajeshphy.github.io

Discussion

Share This Page